Improvement of yield and photosynthetic indices of ‘Lollo Rosso’ lettuce by bacterial biofertilizer at different concentrations of phosphorus under hydroponic culture

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor of Horticulture science, Department of Horticultural Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Phosphorus is the second limiting element of plant yield after nitrogen. Rock phosphate is a non-renewable resource. Global data shows that by 2050 the requirement for P fertilizers will increase by 50-100% and universal phosphate rock resources will be evacuated within the next 50-100 years (Cordell et al. 2009). Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms such as bacteria are one of the most important tools for researchers in reducing of phosphorus fertilizers consumption in agriculture. Despite many studies on the effect of bacteria on physiological reactions and plant performance in soil culture, there are few reports on the effect of bacteria on these reactions in hydroponic culture. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of Bacillus subtilis on yield, photosynthetic properties and reducing of phosphorus fertilizers consumption in hydroponic culture.
Material and methods: The experiment was factorial based on a completely randomized design with three replicates. A greenhouse experiment was performed to evaluate the effect of Bacillus subtilis UTB96 and different concentrations of nutrient phosphorus (12.5, 25, 37.5, 50 and 62.5 mg L-1) on the yield, pigments and photosynthetic index, root-to-shoot phosphorus ratio and bacterial population. ‘Lollo Rosso’ lettuce seedlings were prepared under greenhouse conditions. Probio 96® biological fertilizer was used to inoculate the ‘Lollo Rosso’ lettuce seedlings at time of transplant by utilization a root dip method (with submergence for 5 min); then a repeated inoculation was conducted at 20 days after transplanting by watering 25 mL of the inoculums plant-1. Lettuce plants were grown in soilless culture with the Resh nutrient solution (Resh, 2012). P was added as KH2PO4 at the following concentrations of 12.5, 25, 37.5, 50, and 62.5 mg L-1. Photosynthetic indices were measured during growth and traits such as yield and physiological characteristics were measured at harvest time (50 days after transplanting). All data were statistically analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the SAS 9.1 software (SAS Inc., Cary NC). Duncan’s multiple-range test was performed at p = 0.05 on each of the significant variables measured.
Results and discussion: The mean comparisons showed that plants inoculated with bacteria had higher yields than uninoculated plants at all levels of phosphorus (Figure 3). Interaction data of bacteria and different concentrations of phosphorus in the nutrient solution showed that, like the 50 mg L-1 treatment, a 25% reduction in phosphorus consumption (37.5 mg/L) caused the highest photosynthesis rates in BS1P3 (Bacterial inoculated and 37.5 mg/L of phosphorus) and BS1P4 (bacterial inoculation and 50 mg/L phosphorus). The findings of this study clearly showed that as in the treatment of 50 mg/L, a reduction of 50% (25 mg L-1) and 25% of phosphorus consumption (concentration of 37.5 mg/L) in treatments with bacterial inoculation caused the highest values of phosphorus concentration in plant tissues and bacterial accumulation in the substrate, respectively (Table3).Today, the positive effects of these bacteria on plant yield to their effect on improving root growth (Rahi, 2016), increasing the absorption of nutrients such as phosphorus (Turom et al., 2007), the production of growth hormones such as auxin and gibberellin (Ruzzi and Aroca, 2015), attributed to the increase of photosynthetic pigments (Rahi, 2016) and the maintenance of photosynthetic efficiency (Wang et al., 2012). Therefore, according to the results of this study, the positive effects of this bacterium on photosynthetic indices may be due to their ability to increase phosphorus uptake in ‘Lollo Rosso’ lettuce, which indirectly affects root growth and photosynthetic efficiency and finally improved the above characteristics.
Conclusions: The results of this study showed that the use of Bacillus subtilis UTB96 biofertilizer improves nutrient uptake, increases the growth of greenhouse plants in hydroponic condition and reduces the phosphorus fertilizers consumption.

Keywords


Adesemoye, A.O., M. Obini, and E. Ugoji. 2008. Comparison of plant growth-promotion with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis in three vegetables. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 39(3): 423-426.
Bukvić, G., M. Antunović, S. Popović, and M. Rastija. 2003. Effect of P and Zn fertilization on biomass yield and its uptake by maize lines (Zea mays L.). Plant Soil Environment. 49: 505-510.
Carter G.A. and A.K. Knapp. 2001. Leaf optical properties in highest plants: linking spectral characteristics to stress and chlorophyll concentration. American Journal of Botany. 88(4): 677-684.
Choudhary, D.K., K.P. Sharma, and R.K. Gaur. 2011. Biotechnological perspectives of microbes in agro-ecosystems. Biotechnology letters. 33: 1905–1910.
Cordell, D., J.O. Drangert, and S. White. 2009. The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Global Environmental Change 19(2): 292-305.
Dey, R., K.K. Pal, D.M. Bhatt, S.M. Chauhan. 2004. Growth promotion and yield enhancement of peanut (Arachis hypogeal L.) by application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiological Research. 159: 371–394.
 Dutta, D. and P. Bandyopadhyay. 2009. Performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to application of phosphorus and bio-fertilizer in laterite soil. Archives Agronomy and Soil Science. 55: 147–155.
El- Kholy, M.A., S.E. Ashly, and A.M. Gomaa. 2005. Biofertilizer of maize crop and its impact on yield and grain nutrient under low rates of mineral fertilizers. Journal of Applied Science Research. 2:117-121.
Garcia-Lopez, A.M. and A. Delgado. 2016. Effect of Bacillus subtilis on phosphorus uptake by cucumber as affected by iron oxide and the solubility of the phosphorus source. Agricultural and Food Science 25: 216-224.
Granada, C.E., L.M.P. Passaglia, E.M. de Souza, and R.A. Sperotto. 2018. Is Phosphate Solubilization the Forgotten Child of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria? Frontiers in Microbiology. 9: 307-310.
Gyaneshwar, P., N. Kumar, L.J. Parekh and P. S. Poole. 2002. Role of soil microorganisms in improving P nutrition of plants. Plant and Soil. 245:83-93.
Idriss, E.E., O. Makarewicz, A. Farouk, K. Rosner, R. Greiner, H. Bochow, T. Richter, and R. Borriss. 2002. Extracellular phytase activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45 contributes to its plant-growth-promoting effectaaThe GenBank accession numbers for the sequences determined in this work are AY055219 to AY055226. Microbiology 148 (7): 2097-2109.
Kalayu, G. 2019. Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms: promising approach as biofertilizers. International Journal of Agronomy 1-7.
Khalafallah, M.A., M.S.M. Saber, and H.K. Abd-El-Maksoun. 1982. Influence of phosphate dissolving bacteria on the efficiency of superphosphate in a calcareous soil cultivated with Vicia faba. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenernahrung und. Bodenkunde. 145 (5): 455–459.
Khaseh Sirjani, A. 2011. Evaluation of biological fertilizer containing phosphorus soluble bacteria and enriched organic fertilizers in wheat cultivation. Journal of Soil Research (Soil and Water Sciences). 25 (3): 224-217.
Kokalis-Burelle, N. 2003. Effects of transplant type, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, and soil treatment on growth and yield of strawberry in Florida. Plant Soil 256: 273–280.
Lavakush Y.J., J.P. Verma, D.K. Jaiswal and A. Kumar. 2014. Evaluation of PGPR and different concentration of phosphorus level on plant growth, yield and nutrient content of rice (Oryza sativa). Ecological Engineering. 62: 123–128.
Lee, S. and J. Lee. 2015. Beneficial bacteria and fungi in hydroponic systems: Types and characteristics of hydroponic food production methods. Scientia Horticulturae. 195: 206-215.
Lichtenthaler, H.K. and C. Buschmann. 2001. Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry. Unit F4.3.1-F4.3.8.
Mansoori, A. 2013. Investigation of the promising line N8119 of wheat to the application of phosphate biofertilizer. Journal of Crop Improvement. 15 (1): 134-125.
Mathur, D.D. and A.S. Bhagsari. 1983. Effect of photosynthetically radiation, temperature and antitranspirants
on photosynthesis and respiration of leather lefern. Horticulture Science. 18: 189-191.
Mitter, B., A. Petric, M.W. Shin, P.S.G. Chain, L. Hauberg-Lotte, B. Reinhold-Hurek, J. Nowak, A. Sessitsch. 2013. Comparative genome analysis of Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN reveals a wide spectrum of endophytic lifestyles based on interaction strategies with host plants. Frontiers of Plant Science. 4: 120.
Molaie, M., S. Tabatabaei, and Y. Sharafi. 2020. Effect of spray and solution application of phosphorus on growth, yield and quality of strawberry in hydroponic cultivation. Horticultural Plants Nutrition. 3 (2): 107-116.
 
Osdaghi, E., S.M. Taghavi, H. Hamzehzarghani, A. Fazliarab, R.M. Harveson, S. Tegli, and J.R. Lamichhane. 2018. Epiphytic Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens strains isolated from symptomless solanaceous vegetables are pathogenic on leguminous but not on solanaceous plants. Plant Pathology: 67(2): 388-398.
Rahi, A. 2016. Effect of Supernitroplas and Biosuprophosphate Biofertilizers on Morphological and Physiological Traits of Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Science and Technology of Greenhouse Cultivation. 7 (26): 135-125.
Ratti, N., S. Kumar. H.N. Verma, and S.P. Gautams. 2001. Improvement in bioavailability of tricalcium phosphate to Cymbopogon martini by rhizobacteria, AMF and azospirillum inoculation. Microbiology Research. 156: 145-147.
Recena, R., J. Torrent, M.C. del Campillo, and A. Delgado. 2015. Accuracy of Olsen P to assess plant P uptake in relation to soil properties and P forms. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 35 (4): 1571-1579.
Resh, H.A. 2012. Hydroponic food production: a definitive guidebook for the advanced home gardener and the commercial hydroponic grower. CRC Press.
Rodriguez H. and R. Fraga. 2009. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnology Advances. 17: 319-339.
Romani, A., P. Pinelli, C. Galardi, G. Sani, A. Cimato, and D. Heimler. 2002. Polyphones in Greenhouse and Open-air-grown lettuce. Food Chemistry. 79: 337–342.
Rudresh, D.L., M.K. Shivaprakash, and R.D. Prasad. 2005 Effect of combined application of Rhizobium, phosphate solubilizing bacterium and Trichoderma spp. On growth, nutrient uptake and yield of chickpea (Cicer aritenium L.). Applied Soil Ecology. 28: 139–146.
Ruzzi, M., and R. Aroca. 2015. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria act as biostimulants in horticulture. Scientia Horticulturae. 196: 124-134.
Sanhita-gupta D., K. Dilp, and K. Srivasta. 2004. Growth promotion of tomato plants by rhizobacteria and imposition of energy stress on Rhizoctonia solani. Soil Biology Biochemistry. 27: 1051-1058.
Satyaprakash, M., T. Nikitha, E.U.B.  Reddi, B. Sadhana, and S.S. Vani. 2017. A review on phosphorous and phosphate solubilising bacteria and their role in plant nutrition. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Scences. 6: 2133–2144.
Sharma, A.K. 2002. Biofertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture. Agrobios, India. 407 p
Shabani. E., S. Bolandnazar, S.J. Tabatabaei, N. Najafi, S. Alizadeh-Salteh, and Y. Rouphael. 2018. Stimulation in the movement and uptake of phosphorus in response to magnetic P solution and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Ocimum basilicum. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 41 (13): 1662-1673. doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2018.1458872.
Smil, V. 2000. Feeding the World: A Challenge for the 21st Century. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Tabatabaei, S.J. 2013. Principles of mineral Nutrition Plant. University of Tabriz press. Tabriz, Iran.
Trolore. S.N., M.J. Hedley, N. Kirk, S. Bolan, and P. Loganathan. 2003. Changes in phosphorous fractions, pH, and phosphates activity in rhizosphere of two rice genotypes. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 41: 471-499.
Turom, M., N. Ataglu, and F. Sahni. 2007. Effect of bacillus FS-3 on growth of tomato (Lycopersicon
esculentum
L.) plants and availability of phosphorus in soil. Plant, Soil and Environment. 53(2): 58-64.
Wang, C.J., W. Yang, C. Wang, C. Gu, D.D. Niu, H.X. Liu, Y.P. Wang, and J.H. Guo. 2012. Induction of drought tolerance in cucumber plants by a consortium of three plant growth-promoting Rhizobacterium strains. PLoS One. 7: 1–10.
 Woitke, M., H. Junge, and W.H. Schnitzler. 2004. Bacillus subtilis as growth promoter in hydroponically grown tomatoes under saline conditions. In VII International Symposium on Protected Cultivation in Mild Winter Climates: Production, Pest Management and Global Competition. 363-369.
Zhang, N., K. Wu, X. He, S. Li, Z. Zhang, B. Shen, X. Yang, R. Zhang, Q. Huang, and Q. Shen. 2011. A new bioorganic fertilizer can effectively control banana wilt by strong colonization with Bacillus subtilis N11.Plant Soil. 344: (1-2).