Morphological and phytochemical response of garlic (Allium sativum) to sulphur, humic acid and vermiwash nutrition

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Horticultural Sciences, Sari Agricultural sciences and Natural Resources University (sanru), Sari, Iran

2 Horticultural Sciences and Engineering Department, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari

3 Department of Horticultural Sciences and Engineering, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari

Abstract

Introduction: Sulphur is an important element for garlic because all the species of the Aliaceae family, including the garlic, are sulphur friend. Garlic accumulats this element in a large extent, and respond to sulphur nutrition remarkably. Elemental sulphur requires oxidation by Thiobacillus bacteria to be absorbable for plants root and the population of these bacteria has a positive correlation with soil organic matter (Sabbagh et al, 2016). Therefore, the addition of organic matter increases the oxidation of sulphur and ultimately increases the sulphur content of the plant.
Materials and Methods: Regarding the role of soil organic matter in increasing sulphur oxidation, a factorial experiment was carried out with two factors of sulphur (S0, S1 and S2) and organic amendments (Control: C, Humic Acid: H, and vermiwash: V). Various traits including yield and yield components, photosynthetic parameters, nutrient elements, total antioxidant activity, total phenol, total flavonoid and caffeic acid were measured. Antioxidant activity and caffeic acid were determined based on Ebrahimzadeh et al, (2010) and Hu and Kitts, (2000) respectively. Data analysis was performed using SAS software and mean comparison by Duncan's multiple range test at 1 and 5 percent probability levels.
Results and discussion: The results showed that the highest total yield of garlic plant was observed in S1V treatment, although, had no significant difference with S1C and S2C treatments. The highest single garlic weight was obtained in S1C treatment, which was significantly more than all other treatments. The maximum garlic length was observed in S2C treatment, which did not show significant differences with S1V and S1C. The highest photosynthesis rate (A) was recorded in S1C treatment, which was significantly higher than all other studied treatments. The highest amount of sulphur in the edible part of garlic was observed in S1H treatment, which was significantly higher than control and all other treatments. The highest amount of antioxidant capacity in the edible part of garlic was observed in S2C treatment. The content of total phenol in the three treatments S0V, S1V and S1C was significantly lower than the control, while the rest of the treatments did not differ in comparison with the control. The concentration of caffeic acid varied from 11.36 to 20.46 mg/kg; which had the highest amount of caffeic acid in the organic amendments factor were control and vermiwash with no significant difference. It seems that with increasing soil organic matter, some natural stresses in soil may be reduced and, as a result, the amount of some antioxidant-related substances such as caffeic acid decreased.
Conclusions:  In general, the use of sulphur with a moderate concentration and no organic amendment increased the yield of garlic. In order to generalize the results of this study to other farms, it should be noted that the soil used in this experiment contained a fairly high percentage of organic matter (3.80%). So in soils with the same amount of organic matter there is no need for extra organic modifiers and sulphur nutrition alone is sufficient. As the results indicated, increased nitrogen and phosphorus absorption took place in humic acid and vermiwash treatments that is very important from a nutritional point of view.

Keywords


Akhavan, Z. and A.R. Fallah Nosrat Abad. 2013. The effect of sulfur and Thiobacillus inoculant on soil pH, dry matter weight and phosphorus absorption by Canola. J. of Soil Management and Sustainable, 3(1): 1-13.
Arslan, G. and E. Pehlivan. 2008. Uptake of Cr3+ from aqueous solution by lignite-based humic acids. Bioresource Technology, 99: 7597-605.
Asli, S. and P.M. Neumann. 2010. Rhizosphere humic acid interacts with root cell walls to reduce hydraulic conductivity and plant development. Plant Soil, 336: 313-322.
Atiyeh, R.M., S. Subler, C.A. Edwards., G. Bachman., J.D.  Metzger and W. Shuster.  2000. Effects of vermicomposts and composts on plant growth in horticulture container media and soil. Pedobiologia44, 579-590.
Atmaca, G. 2004. Antioxidant effects of sulfur-containing amino acids. Yonsei Med J. 2004 Oct 31;45(5):776-88.
Aydin, A., C. Kant and M. Turan. 2012. Humic acid application alleviate salinity stress of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants decreasing membrane Leakage. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(7): 1104-1109.
Azarpour, E., M.K. Motamed., M. Moraditochaee and H.R. Bozorgi. 2012. Effects of bio, mineral nitrogen fertilizer management, under humic acid foliar spraying on fruit yield and several traits of eggplant (Solanum melongena). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(7): 1104-1109.
Beato, V.M., F. Orgaz., F. Mansilla and A. Montaño.  2011. Changes in phenolic compounds in garlic (Allium sativum L.) owing to the cultivar and location of growth. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 66(3): 218-223.
Chandel, B.S., P.K. Thakur., J. Ali and H. Singh. 2012. Soil sulphur status and response of garlic to sulphur in relation to phosphorus. Ann. Pl. Soil Res. 14(2): 156-158.
Chang, C., M. Yang., H. Wen and J. Chern. 2002. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. Journal of Food Drug Anal, 10: 178-182
Ebrahimzadeh, MA., S.F. Nabavi., S.M Nabavi and B. Eslami. 2010. Antihemolytic and antioxidant activities of Allium paradoxum. Central European Journal of Biology. 5: 338-345.
George, S., R.S. Giraddi and R.H Patil.  2007. UtiLty of vermiwash for the management of Thrips and Mites on chilL (Capsicum annuum L.) amended with soil organics. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science. 20: 657-659.
Ghorbani, S., H.R. Khazaee., M. Kafi and M. Banayan aval. 2010. Effect of humic acid application in irrigation water on yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.) Journal of Agricultural Ecology, 2: 118-111.
 
Haghighi, M., M. Kafi., P. Fang and L. Gui-Xiao. 2010. Humic acid decreased hazardous of cadmium toxicity on on lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Vegetabe Crops Research Bulletin, 72: 49-69.
Hawkesford, M.J. and L.J. De Kok.  2006. Managing sulphur metabolism in plants. Plant, Cell and Environment, 29: 382–395.
Hu, C. and D.D. Kitts. 2000. Studies on antioxidant activity of Echinacea root extract. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 48(5): 1466-1472.
Karakurt, Y., H. Unlu and H. Padem. 2009. The influence of foliar and soil fertilization of humic acid on yield and quality of papper. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil & Plant Science, 59(3): 233-273.
Lillo, C., U. Slea and P. Ruoff. 2008. Nutrient depletion as a key factor for manipulating gene expression and product formation in different branches of the flavonoid pathway. Plant, Cell and Environment .31, 587–601
Nardi, S., A. Muscolo., S. Vaccaro., S. Baiano., R. Spaccini and A. Piccolo. 2007. Relationship between molecular characteristics of soil humic fractions and glycolytic pathway and krebs cycle in maize seedlings. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39: 3138-3146.
Piccolo, A., G. Celano and G. Pietramellara. 1993. Effects of fractions of coalderived humic substances on seed germination and growth of seedlings (Lactuca sativa and Lycopersicum esculentum). Biology and Fertility of Soils, 16: 11-15.
Prabhu, M.J. 2006. Coconut leaf vermiwash stimulates crop yield. The Hindu Newspaper, 28th December, In:  Science and Technology Section.
Quaggiotti, S., B. Ruperti., D. Pizzeghello., O. Francioso., V. Tugnoli and S. Nardi. 2004. Effect of low molecular size humic substances on the expression of genes involved in nitrate transport and reduction in maize (Zea mays). Journal of Experimental Botany, 55: 803-13.
Rahmatpour, S., H. Ali khvani and S.H. Mer Sead Hassani.  2015. Effect of Vermicelli spray on wheat growth and yield index and zinc, iron and phosphorus in wheat grain. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 44 (2): 211-203.
Rasaei, B., M.E. Ghobadi., M. Ghobadi and A. Najaphy. 2013. Reducing effects of drought stress by application of humic acid, mycorrhiza and rhizobium on chickpea International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 5(16): 1775-1778.
Ropme, 1999. Manual of Oceanographic Observation and Pollutant Analysis Methods (MOOPAM), 3rd edition. Regional Organization for the Protection of the Marine Environment.
Sabbagh, H., M. Khorrami Vafa., S. Jalali Hnarmand and A. Beheshti Alagha. 2016. Effect of Thiobacillus, Sulfur and Fertilizer on the Concentration of Some Mineral Ingredients in Garlic Flour. The 2nd National Conference on Medicinal Plants and Sustainable Agriculture. (in Persian with English abstract).
Saruhan, V., A. Kusvuran and S. Babat. 2011. The effect of different humic acid fertilization on yield components performances of common millet (Panicum miliaceum). Scientific Research and Essays, 6(3): 663-669.
Slinkard, K. and V.L. Singleton. 1977. Total phenol analysis: automation and comparison with manual methods. Amrican Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 28: 49-55.
Shojaee, M., H. Roosta., M. Roozban and H. Soufi. 2019. Evaluation of the growth characteristics and changes in the concentration of some nutrient elements of garlic affected by different nitrogen sources and alkalinity in hydroponic culture. Horticultural Plant Nutrition 2(1): 33-50.
Taullley, H. and A. Semnani. 2002. Methods for the analysis of soils, plants, waters and fertilizers. Compilation h L Tendon Shahid Chamran University Press. First Edition. 219 pages.
Turan, M.A., N. Taban., J. Turkmen and S. Taban. 2010. Selenium concentration of garlic bulbs grown in different parts of turkey. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 22(8): 6563-6568.
Wainwright, M., W. Nevell and S.J. Grayston. 1986. Effects of organic matter on sulphur oxidation in soil and influence of Sulphur oxidation on soil nitrification. Plant and Soil 96, 369-376.
Waling, I., W. Van Vark, V.J.G. Houba and Van der Lee, J.J. 1989. Soil and Plant Analysis. Part 7, plant analysis procedures. Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen
Westerman, R.E.L.1990. Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. SSSA, Mandison Wisconzin, USA..